Meeting Abstract
Though scientific research often uses cutting-edge methods, requires acts of courage, involves determination and persistence to arrive at startling results, these stories are not always visible or obvious to the public. Equipping interpreters and docents at parks, museums, zoos, and aquariums with up-to-date information on research increases the likelihood that the public will learn of current research and have a chance to discuss its relevance. The research brief is a popular format for conveying the basics of research studies. Though the traditional format has some advantages. Such briefs usually are clear and appropriately detailed, they read as a dry condensed version of a published article or annual report. There are compelling reasons to break with this tradition. Recommendations for research brief content and format follow from an inventory of 85 research briefs available through the National Park Service and interviews with 19 national park professionals. We report on existing briefs in terms of: 1) Reading level and readability 2) Use of images and figures 3) Use of sub-heads and questions. We also share interviewees’ responses, highlighting: Interpreters stated comfort level when relying on a two-page document to discuss the research with the public; what is missing as they consider using briefs; and the features they comment on positively. Recommendations will be of interest to those determined to see research prominent in public venues for informal learning and who are committed to creating resources that equip interpreters to bring science into the public eye.
