Energy budgets to explain allometry lessons from flying ninja hummingbirds


SOCIETY FOR INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY
2021 VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING (VAM)
January 3 – Febuary 28, 2021

Meeting Abstract


53-4  Sat Jan 2  Energy budgets to explain allometry: lessons from flying ninja hummingbirds Shankar, A*; Davalos, LM; Powers, DR; Graham, CH; Cornell University, Ithaca NY and Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY; Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY; George Fox University, Newberg OR; Swiss Federal Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland and Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY nushiamme@gmail.com http://anushashankar.weebly.com

Groups with unusual allometric relationships can provide new avenues for physiological and ecological research. According to the metabolic-level boundaries hypothesis, metabolic rates as a function of mass are expected to scale closer to 0.67 when driven by surface-related processes (e.g. heat or water flux), while volume-related processes (e.g. activity) generate slopes closer to one. In birds, daily energy expenditure (DEE) scales with body mass (M) with a slope of 0.68, consistent with surface-level processes driving the relationship. However, taxon-specific patterns differ from the scaling slope of all birds. Hummingbirds have the highest mass-specific metabolic rates among all vertebrates. Previous studies on a few hummingbird species, without accounting for the phylogeny, estimated that the DEE–body mass slope for hummingbirds to be 1.21. In contrast to theoretical expectations, this slope >1 indicates that larger hummingbirds are less metabolically efficient than smaller hummingbirds. We collected DEE and mass data for 12 hummingbird species, which, combined with published data, represented 17 hummingbird species in eight of nine hummingbird clades over a six-fold size range of body size (2.7–17.5 g). After accounting for phylogenetic relatedness, we found DEE scales with body mass with a slope of 0.96. This slope of 0.96 is lower than previously estimated for hummingbirds, but much higher than the slope for all birds (0.68). The high slopes of torpor, hovering and flight potentially explain the high interspecific DEE slope for hummingbirds compared to other endotherms.

the Society for
Integrative &
Comparative
Biology