Direct and Indirect Predation Cues Affect Prey Foraging Behavior and Physiology


Meeting Abstract

115-5  Sunday, Jan. 8 09:00 – 09:15  Direct and Indirect Predation Cues Affect Prey Foraging Behavior and Physiology PRITCHARD, CE*; CLINCHY, M; ZANETTE, LY; SHERIFF, MJ; Penn State Univ., State College PA; Univ. of Victoria, Canada; Univ. of Western Ontario, Canada; Penn State Univ., State College PA cep197@psu.edu http://catepritchard.weebly.com

Predation is one of the central organizing themes in ecology. Predators may affect their prey through both direct predation (i.e. killing), and indirect predation (i.e. risk effects). Two important outcomes of risk effects are physiological and behavioral changes, with physiological changes mediating behavior to return the animal to homeostasis. However, rarely are these two outcomes studied in concert in wild animals exposed to chronic predation stress in the field. Here, we exposed wild deer mice to chronic predation stress in the field via aerial predator playbacks. After 18 days of exposure, deer mice continued to have elevated glucocorticoid levels and decreased foraging in predator-exposed vs. control grids. Foraging was also dependent on microhabitat, such that foraging further decreased in open areas compared to closed, highly vegetated areas. Our results suggest that behavioral shifts did not compensate for physiological changes and vice versa after 18 days. Further, physiological and behavioral changes may be codependent, and driven by multiple risk stimuli simultaneously, resulting in context-dependent antipredator behaviors of various magnitudes.

the Society for
Integrative &
Comparative
Biology