The postabsorptive and postprandial metabolic rates of praying mantises comparisons across species, body masses, and meal sizes


Meeting Abstract

P3-172  Saturday, Jan. 7 15:30 – 17:30  The postabsorptive and postprandial metabolic rates of praying mantises: comparisons across species, body masses, and meal sizes ISABELLA, I*; MCCUE, M/D; St. Mary’s Univ mmccue1@stmarytx.edu

The metabolic rate of an animal affects the amount of energy available for its growth, activity and reproduction and, ultimately, shapes how energy and nutrients flow through ecosystems. Standard metabolic rate (SMR; when animals are post-absorptive and at rest) and specific dynamic action (SDA; the cost of digesting and processing food) are two major components of animal metabolism. SMR has been studied in hundreds of species of insects, but very little is known about the SMR of praying mantises. We measured the rates of CO2 production as a proxy for metabolic rate and tested the prediction that the SMR of mantises more closely resembles the low SMR of spiders – a characteristic generally believed to be related to their sit-and-wait foraging strategy. Although few studies have examined SDA in insects we also tested the prediction that mantises would exhibit comparatively large SDA responses characteristic of other types of predators (e.g., snakes) known to consume enormous, protein-rich meals. The SMR of the mantises was positively correlated with body mass and did not differ among the four species we examined. Their SMR was best described by the equation uWatts = 1526 * grams0.745 and was not significantly different from that predicted by the standard ‘insect-curve’; but it was significantly higher than that of spiders to which mantises are ecologically more similar than other insects. Mantises consumed meals as large as 138 % of their body mass and within 6-12 h of feeding and metabolic rates doubled before gradually returning to prefeeding rates over the subsequent four days. We found that the SDA responses were isometrically correlated with meal size and the relative cost of digestion was 38 % of the energy in each meal.

the Society for
Integrative &
Comparative
Biology